Pages

Saturday, August 31, 2019

Politics: independent vs. Independent


graph image of USA 3 most prominent political ideals-republican, democratic, independent (leaving out Green, and others, although there are many)
Speaking of independent politics, we must address the popularity of the idea as well as our goals with this site.

The idea of independence has gained such popularity again in this age of identity success that the idea has been capitalized and endorsed as a new political party. While this is a good thing (at least, it adds to our options and buffers the influence of the two major parties of division), we need to be able to separate the idea from any political party. 

We want to be clear, that when we speak of independent politics on this site, we don't necessarily or usually mean to indicate that we're speaking of the American Independent Party or its characteristics. Although we will, from time to time, host posts relating to any political party. When we do, we will use the appropriate capitalization of the designated term, as well as other indications. 

Generally, the term independent as it's used on this site will not be capitalized. An independent or nonpartisan politician (or constituent, voter) is an individual not affiliated with any political party. 

There are many reasons why someone may stand for office as an independent, or care to remain independently free to vote per election. Independents may support policies which are different from those of the major political parties. Independents may simply wish to dissociate from parties that have veered off course. The list goes on. 

Friday, August 30, 2019

An Ideal World of Identity Politics

Identity politics are a challenge, even when you want to remain independent of all the fuss—as much as possible. 


Although, to desire such independence from issues doesn't necessarily suggest that we should ignore any of them. Rather, we should appreciate any items that make it to our congressional tables. It is not until these items are on display that we can see that they exist.

For a time, all we can do is see that such issues exist. We leave them on the table, rather than set them aside as if we never became aware of them.

Over time, we respectfully address each issue until it's resolved.


Follow us via email for interesting, independent perspectives delivered to your inbox.
(There will be no junk, and definitely no spam or sales of your email.)

Thursday, August 29, 2019

New Netflix Documentary Shows Critical Eye on US Labor Standards and Practices

Irritating to witness, damaging to experience: how US labor is less glamorous than they'd have you believe


Terrific bit of news in documentary land reports that educational entertainment exposes some of the weaknesses seen in American business and HR management.

Some will recognize these behaviors, which come down a corporate ladder and other times from ambitious, misguided management in efforts to control employees:
  • excessive praise given (sometimes expected, often dreaded)
  • overbearing 'confidence' boosting (unnecessary frivolity and excuse to belittle employees)
  • freedom-trampling behavior on part of anti-employee-organization employers. 
See how it's done, who made it, where to watch it via USA Today: New production company successfully shines light on power-outsider perspective of US business labor practices and misguided, often malevolent, human resource management. 

Monday, August 5, 2019

Weekend News Breakdown — Politics

Quick takes on weekend news:


Violent offenders take lives in shootings meant to to punish whole societies . . .

 . . . and Mexico ups the ante by threatening legal action against the United States, in regard to the violent actions of the shooters.

Keeping a rape list was enough to get one of the future violents suspended from school, but apparently not enough to have charged him with any kind of terroristic threat.

Bullying makes the news again, in the form of violent outcome. Maybe there should be an actionable law against bullyism . . . a close relative to terrorism.

Extremes of violence around the globe have unseen roots. In Hong Kong, a city-wide strike.

Popular site for gun-lovers shuts down amid latest troubles.

Media recalls rhetoric behind shooting immigrants.






Sunday, August 4, 2019

A Fear-Based Society in Peril: What will it take to overcome the threats?


Our conversations in the U.S. almost seem less heated, rather than more, after 251 mass shootings in only 261 days.

We're becoming desensitized.

It's still there, the argumentation; but, it's muted. We've essentially muted each other.
Unfortunately, we also seem to be stuck in same old, basic points.

Guns - nay!

Guns - yea!

There is very little talk of problem-solving, intermediate actions that could be taken in order to bring us all closer to a safer environment—one less intent on destruction.

Thankfully, we still have a representative government in place. It may not be functional, quite . . . but it's in place.

Yes, violence has always been as the beck and call of any society, as well as easily roused in certain environments and under particular circumstances. But the frequency and pervasiveness of random violence today certainly demands a different approach than that to which we're accustomed. The nature of our violence has changed, much of the preponderance rooted in a desire to instill fear on a larger scale . . . aka mass terrorism.

The Roots of Fear Grow a Sprawling Shade


In its smaller forms, terrorism hardly makes a recognizable impact on society. For example: without education, a community doesn't recognize a family unit that lives in fear of its patriarch (or matriarch, as luck would have it). In fact, such a small number hardly makes any impact on the whole of society, and with education often will nonetheless fall into the cracks and away from sight.

When larger numbers, however, find that they must consider the consequences of making an appearance in public, our basic awareness moves ahead of education in its effectiveness to gaining attention.

Still, little may be undertaken to address what hasn't been officially deemed a big-enough problem. School shootings come to mind. These major events are yet ensconced within local communities and often considered to be local issues despite their more widely-spread roots. Hence, more cracks in our facade of an effectively governed populace.

Then movie theaters, churches, and bars. 


The scope of the problem widens. The familial, or individual, outing to a local church or movie theater becomes a thing of trepidation. The problem is no longer a thing of teen angst, contained to that isolated world.

Overall, though—it's still a smaller problem than will effect change. People tell themselves they won't be affected, or more accurately: surely it won't happen again. More, "This movie I've picked will likely not attract a shooter."

"My church is obscure enough (or conventional enough, or big enough)" to not be a target.
 Or, "It just happened; it's not likely to happen again so soon."

We tell ourselves these things, consciously or not, as we make our various plans for errands, activities and entertainment in a world going awry.

Then concerts and shopping malls. Oh my.

Then Walmart(s). Oh shit.  

Surely, within representative chambers, elected and appointed officials are hard at work in the manner necessary on our primary issue of wanton violence along with its root causes. Don't you think?

Because if we take the worst advice and let the responsibility fall from them to us . . .
that could be all she said.